A Look into Niagara's Local Music Scene

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

SCENE 2013 Video Montage!


Here is a short montage of a few videos and photos I took at SCENE. If you want to know more about what bands played or where you can find their music leave a comment!
NOTE: The music is loud in this video so check that you have your speakers turned down a little if you don't want to be startled. 

Module 4: In Summation



In lieu of a summative post (due to having no comments) I’m going to give a “reflective” post on “Copy, Transform, Combine,” while also sharing some of my experiences and observations from this past Sunday’s S.C.E.N.E Music festival. 

In my post “Copy, Transform, Combine” I stated my opinion of the importance of culturally common materials that have low production costs. Having stated this I reflect on it now and I realize that this is a very broad and general statement that has many issues. First and foremost – my statement assumes that cultural products with low production costs are not worth paying for and this is not true. However small in value, it does still hold value and this is not to be overlooked. But I do affirm my point that there needs to be some sort of culturally common material to be used as building blogs. 

Now switching the pace – a common thing that I observed during the SCENE music festival this past weekend was the use of cover songs by bands. There are many things that could be said about this. I think that bands use cover songs during their live sets to keep the audience intrigued and to connect with them. With an audience member who may not be familiar with a band’s songs and may experience their performance with less enthusiasm because of this, a cover of a song offers a new connection between listener and band. Now I am not familiar with the copyright laws regarding the use of cover songs during live shows. But it would be my assumption of logic that because nothing is being recorded (intentionally) by the band that it would be free to do.

So doesn’t the sampling of other band or artists song have the same concept of playing a cover live? Kind of like my suggestion of allusions and intertextuality in literature? It creates a connection with the consumer/producer based on material that is KNOWN to be someone else’s. Isn’t that how knowledge and ideas are circulated? This is why culturally common material is fundamentally needed, and this is why I believe that copyright laws on music should be loosened and the boundaries of prosecution redefined.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

"Copy, Transform, Combine"

Remember back to high school English for a moment. Recall the terms such as allusion, or intertextuality - these terms are attached to literary works that reference other texts to create meaning, whether it is direct or implied. And these are commonly accepted scholarly concepts that have been engrained in our minds from a very young age. It is culturally acceptable to allude to another person’s writing, and it is recognized and supported by literary communities. Literature is a remix!

So why does the distribution and remix of cultural products online pose so many issues? We've been doing it for hundreds of years through published literature!

Kirby Ferguson`s videos (Everything's a Remix) raises the key point of market economics. This is in my opinion the dominant cause of all sample and patent lawsuits. In short, it all comes down to greed. Jenkins also focuses largely on the market economics of online cultural content distribution, although his is a less “greed” themed argument and takes a “struggling” tone, empathizing with both producers and consumers.
Jenkins is justified and balances his arguments in favour of both sides of the producer consumer spectrum, and I think that this is important. In order to have “freely accessible cultural commons,” we need to understand how we are consuming, and how material is being given to us.

In order for fully accessible cultural commons, I think that producers of cultural products need to redefine the monetary value placed on them. It is widely known by consumers that movies, for example, have extremely high production costs, and therefore consumers justify their purchase of movie theatre admissions or DVD purchases this way. Conversely, an internet blogger wishing to use a photo that is relevant to their writing would not value the photo in the same way one values a movie. Therefore, I argue that low production cost material or no production cost material SHOULD be made culturally common. Because without the building blocks for cultural production, such as photos, sound bytes, short video clips, fan fiction, etc. etc. etc., there is no way for culture to evolve. It’s just what Kirby Ferguson stated in his system failure video: “Copy, transform, combine.”


 References:


Jenkins, H. (2004) The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence  International Journal of Cultural Studies March 2004 7: 33-43

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Wikipedia, refined

Wikipedia is a platform for information that many people use for different benefits. Without researching, it’s hard for me to compare the ways that I use Wikipedia to the ways in which others do. What I have found with many people I know that use Wikipedia, is that it is used as a starting point when beginning research. What I like to do is find a Wikipedia page on a topic and read what’s there to get a general idea of what it is I want to know. I then use the “external links” sections to seek out more credible information (so to speak) and scholarly articles that I can cite on my topic. 

While Wikipedia is user uploaded and edited content, it is still monitored by a group of administrators. And when you think about it anything user uploaded on a topic can be taken from anywhere on the internet. So when the one article talked about how wiki entries were very similar to other online encyclopedias such as Brittanica, it could be suggested that the users are using Brittanica as a main source. So couldn't we deem Wikipedia a collection of sources, which could infact improve knowledge on a topic. Where one source lacks, another source will make up for it, creating a more refined source of information. If there is multiple sources being used and administrators editing and watching for inconsisitencies in information, isn't Wiipedia, in theory, a better source for information?


Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Module 2 Summative Post

The feedback I received from my "I share, therefore I am" was expansive and enlightening. 
I received a total of 1 comment (expansive and enlightening right?) so I will do my best to reflect here on what my one respondent said. 

An interesting point of confidence building via social media was brought up, in reference to Turkle's idea of online alias' providing a chance for people to act out in ways that they normally wouldn't. I was asked: "Do you think there's a different between public and anonymous social media regarding confidence? Does Facebook make people more confident, or more depending on approval?"
 
I definitely think that there is a difference between public and private social media regarding confidence. Both boost or promote confidence but in different ways. Social media where real identity is used and your profile is a reflection of your true self seeks approval or confirmation of personal or physical characteristics one is insecure about. These public platforms give a safe area to upload or share content and if the response is not what we want or does not boost confidence it can be deleted and does not have to be faced again.
When dealing with anonymous platforms, the confidence we seek or build up is achieved through a different manner. The anonymity allows us to lie, exaggerate or fabricate ideas of ourselves and/or parts of our lives that we don’t like, or wish were different. Therefore I argue that public social media is an extension of our real selves (i.e Facebook or twitter) but anonymous or fabricated personal profiles are an area for an adjusted or idealized life for the user.                                                                 

Friday, May 17, 2013

S.C.E.N.E is fast approaching!

It's only 22 days away! If you're as excited as I am, you should buy your ticket soon on the website!

Every year Scene Fest always provides music lovers with a variety of genres and talent. This year there's LOADS of local talent! Check out some of these local acts and get your ticket and support them on June 9th!

Crystalyne: A pop punk quartet fronted by Marissa Dattoli, who always kicks ass and delivers a great performance.

American Hell: they will melt your face off. If you like punk rock, hardcore and metal, check them out!

My Son the Hurricane: this 14 member stage act mixes an 8 piece brass section with on stage antics to give an always exciting and energetic performance.

Lambs Become Lions: this local act is signed to Indoor Shoes (check out my post on websites to check out!), a local record label and promotions company, and always gives an intimate and dedicated musical performance. Definitely check this band out.




Thursday, May 16, 2013

"I share, therefore I am"









I among many other million people in the world have and maintain almost daily a personal Facebook (FB) page online. Personally, I view my FB profile as a reflection of myself and value highly what people think of the information and material they see on it. As well, there is a defined boundary which I avoid at all costs to cross when it comes to disclosing my personal information and information that may implicate me in any way with employers and teachers, etc. For example, I do not post a relationship status, I do not post my address, and I do not post my age.
  
I found Demetri Martin’s satirical take on Myspace friends (which in theory is the same concept as having FB friends) very true, but it is also something I do not wish to experience online. I keep my connections on FB very limited to 200 or less, and if I have not met or do not know someone personally in real life, I do not connect with them. This is because of what I have aforementioned about keeping my personal information online limited. Limiting the audience of your content limits the amount of personal information being circulated against my will. 

Sherry Turkle outlined 3 very interesting and very true points (in my opinion) in her TEDtalk on why people use online social media. They were 1) we’ll have attention everywhere, 2) we’ll always be heard, 3) We’ll never have to be alone. 

At first glance, one could outright deny these statements because, let’s face it, they’re kind of embarrassing to accept. But aren’t they true? I can personally accept these statements as true to me, through the ways I use FB. I upload self-portraits to my profile for attention, and it would almost be ignorant to say one uploads photos of themselves just to save them there. We make photos of ourselves public because we want to know what people think of the way we look or receive praise and flattery that we wouldn’t normally get in out day to day encounters. 

As Turkle said in her TEDtalk, “[Social media] is changing how people think of themselves, it’s shaping a new way of being … I share, therefore I am.” If we don’t share content on our profiles, no one views them therefore we cease to have online presence.
When considering and understanding the uses and gratifications that come from using social media, Turkle makes an interesting statement that online social networking gives people the ability to reveal characteristics or personality traits about one self that would otherwise never be shared. Confidence plays a major role in the initial desire to use social media. 

So now I ask you for some comments! 

Do you feel more confident in yourself when using social media? Is it confidence in your appearance or personality that you seek or have, and why is it different from the way you present yourself in real life?



 

Sources:

Cyberspace and Identity Sherry Turkle Contemporary Sociology Vol. 28, No. 6 (Nov., 1999), pp. 643-648 http://www.jstor.org.proxy.library.brocku.ca/stable/pdfplus/2655534.pdf?acceptTC=true

Sherry Turkle. The Flight From Conversation. New York Times Sunday Review. April 21, 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/opinion/sunday/the-flight-from-conversation.html?pagewanted=all

Places we don’t want to go: Sherry Turkle at TED2012 http://blog.ted.com/2012/03/01/places-we-dont-want-to-go-sherry-turkle-at-ted2012/

Demetri Martin on The Daily Show:
http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/correspondents/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart---demetri-martin/clip141030#clip141030